Child marriage is prevalent in South Asia, as it is estimated there are 285 million child brides. At present 59% of women aged 20–24 in Bangladesh were married under the age of 18, 40% in Nepal and 27 % in India. Child marriage is regarded as one of the harmful traditional practice existing in Nepal since time immemorial. Nepal aims to end child marriage by 2030 as part of its commitment to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Moreover, the government of Nepal has already sanctioned a national strategy that provides an overarching framework to end child marriage. At the meantime, the criminal law of Nepal considers child marriage as a crime and punishes the person who perform or cause to perform child marriage.
This research is a part of this consortium project which was commissioned by Women Rehabilitation Center along with International Women’s Rights Action Watch – Asia Pacific (IWRAW-AP) and other South Asian organizations for South Asian Initiative on FIRE from July 2019 to October 2020. Also, the data collection and the law review for the research report has been conducted from March 2020 to October 2020.
This report aims to find out the changing trend of child marriage like either forced or self-initiated or other forms. Further, it also endeavors to understand the deep-rooted causes of the child marriage and its interconnectedness with the impacts it create to the girls and boys at different levels of their livelihood, family relations, reproductive health and legal consequences from adolescent perspectives. Finally, this report focuses on to revisit the laws on absolute criminalization of the child marriage and its effectiveness on controlling the agencies, decision making and choice of adolescents regarding marriage.
This research report is based on qualitative methodology to conduct research, policy review and analysis. For this, the case studies were collected from 5 districts of the country namely, Morang, Dhanusha, Sunsari, Dang and Kailali. A total number of 21 cases studies were collected and analyzed during this study.
Major Findings:
- The practice of forced marriage is decreasing while the self-initiative marriages are increasing or even in case of child marriage the family are also taking consent of the child before arranging their marriage which is yet to be acknowledged by the law relating child marriage.
- The occurrence of child marriage has been increased with the increasing age of adolescent as it was high among the girls and boys above 16 to 18 years and 18 to 20 years.
- The case study shows that, the root causes of child marriage fundamentally intertwine with the structural inequalities of poverty, caste, class, gender norms, discrimination, lack of parental guidance, violence and abuse including sexual abuse within family, harmful custom of child marriage, increasing trend of child marriage, effectiveness of legal system to interagency of the girls considering their age, education, family occupation and mostly the position of prospective groom.
-
- The case study further revealed that, child marriage has led to devastating effect and even determined one’s life trajectory except in few cases. The impacts could be stated as discontinuity in education for boys and girls, problems in health ranging from physical health problem to sexual and reproductive health, pregnancy, engagement of adolescents in household chores and unpaid care work to performing job in market in unskilled and temporary low paid jobs or disproportionate criminalization of boys of lower caste or class or forceful separation, increasing possibility of violence to girl child from husband and in-laws, increasing in mental stress and in some cases even leading to suicide, lack of legal protection of marital and spousal relationship like marriage registration, citizenship, etc., including lack of legal protection to the dependents, such as birth registration certificate, etc.
-
- The Constitution of Nepal 2015 A.D has provided guarantee against child marriage. Accordingly, there are various acts which provides for punishing and responding to child marriage, i,e., State Criminal Code, 2017 (2074), the act relating to children, 2018 (2075), State criminal procedure code, 2017(2074), State civil code, 2017(2074) and others. They have mainly provided followings: o The age of majority for marriage is 20 years of age. In child marriage, the consent of adolescent is disregarded and all form of child marriage are punished as they are deemed by law as
“forced marriage”.
-
-
- The marriage conducted between anyone of the person below 20 years is to be ipso facto void and the party to be marriage are to punished according to the law of the country
- The child marriage however, do not encroach the rights of children born out of child marriage in terms of their birth registration or property rights such as partition of property,
- The victims of child marriage are provided protection for the states, but it is for upto the children of 18 years of age.
-
- On analyzing the existing legislations against child marriage, it is thus understood that the state has intentionally ladened adolescent’s effort to direct his or her opportunities regarding marriage by placing costs, barriers, or prohibitions and mainly through absolute criminalization. This has led to various problems:
- Determination of age in marriage: There is a huge difference between marital relationship and being parents. Instead of delaying marriage through criminal law, the protection of adolescent girl’s Sexual and reproductive health can still be done through delaying childbearing.
- Determination of consent: The policy makers has ignored the drivers, consequences and power dynamics between adolescents and parents, and related linkages of own-choice marriages. There needs to be clear distinctions made between love marriages, elopements and arranged marriage, and law makers needs to understand the nature and drivers of each separately.
- Child marriage and its inter-linkage with other criminal laws: The law is not able to determine the consequences of child marriage with child labor, statutory rape, human trafficking, domestic
violence, dowry related torture, hostage taking, bride kidnapping, etc. while in practice the cases of “child marriage” are being registered under these varieties of cases besides child marriage.
-
-
- Inconsistency in the existing laws and inadequacy: State criminal code and the act relating to children on responding with the cases of child marriage as crime, the determination of age of minor, statute of limitation, and the rights to child victim are different and not consistent with each other.
- Law is being used to break-up own choice relationship weakening adolescents agency: The law is used by parents for the forceful separation of married couples. Consequently, this phenomenon has disproportionately increased criminalization of certain “caste” and “class” population boys while the girls also undergo the pangs of separation.
- Observation of marital obligation by the parties to child marriage despite the “void” status in law has increased vulnerability to abuse, exploitation and human rights violation of girl child: In the cases where child marriage is identified and there is the will to end it, annulment or divorce are not straightforward. Laws do not adequately protect child brides and child grooms, or those who seek annulments or divorces.
- The law does not protect underage persons from continuum of harm to the survivor: The law is absolute on terming underage marriage as a criminal offence due to which those impacted by marriage do not receive the adequate protection of the State in terms of getting legal support or protection or rehabilitation in family or society or alternate care in society. The Act relating to children 2075(2018) is not adequate to meet the necessity of adolescents above 18 years of age involved in child marriage.
- Weak enforcement or non-enforcement of law: While laws to punish those, who elope or choose own-choice marriages are enforced too strongly, other laws are not enforced strictly enough. The police personnel and other law enforcement agencies are often driven by their own beliefs about child marriage and thus, do not enforce penalties against parents who force children into marriage
- Incoherent intervention by the government and stakeholders: On following the current law of Nepal which provides for absolute criminalization there is different interventions by the civil organizations, communities and governmental bodies which are mostly focused on the protective and punitive approach denying the rights-based approach of intervention to adolescent.
Recommendations
On the basis of the above findings, the following recommendations are put forwarded to major three actors:
- Nepal government
- Adopt preventive measures:
Nepal government should recognize child marriage as a fundamental rights violation. Keeping child as rights holder acknowledging the capacity and agencies of adolescents the State should develop preventive measures as follows: